LoL. You mean you don't think the CNT is Edencrete is dispersed?...

LoL. You mean you don't think the CNT is Edencrete is dispersed? Is that your argument? Or you claim that its a health hazard?

As for the corrosion "The maximum rate of corrosion in the assessed samples did not exceed 1.85% and this value is still considered as low risk according to ACI 318."

This is the reason they don't recommend CNT

"Given the effort needed for dispersion prior to mixing, the results of the current and previous investigations on the topic, and the health hazards associated with handling nano materials; and the increased tendency to corrosion of CNT-CRETE; the authors are not in favor of using CNTs in concrete to induce mechanical properties improvements."

And it doesn't apply to Edencrete. Check Eden's web page for confirmation on the health hazards of CNT in low concentrations in liquid and the shelf life of the dispersed CNT, which has been independently verified by DoT laboratories as part of the approvals process.

Actually Ahmed Hassan seems to publishes very frequently

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ahmed_Hassan198

Here's one you missed showing the improvement in strength of supporting beams with CNT at high temperature which would indicate greater structural resistance to fire.

https://www.researchgate.net/public...h_Carbon_Nanotubes_under_Elevated_Temperature

Your bias against Eden is so obvious that your opinions and research simply aren't trustworthy.