Agree.
Their technology is not ready for commercialization. Despite the test results. Which is part of my point. CPV has lower efficiency, high production costs, high installation costs, there is no definitive data to justify commercial viability.
If you look at the Tesla roof tiles that generate electricity, there's costings and comparisons to slate roof tiles, etc. It's a premium product that makes for a very expensive roof, but only slightly more expensive than slate roof tiles, but the insulation and electricity generated, justifies the slightly extra cost, when compared to slate tiles.
If the Vicinity installation was paid by Vicinity, the faulty product would have to be replaced. Would the replacement have to be paid by Clearvue? Who pays for product that does not perform to warranty? Were the faults predictable? The performance data points to a commercially nonviable product.
Agree.Their technology is not ready for commercialization....
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CPV (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
58.0¢ |
Change
0.010(1.75%) |
Mkt cap ! $140.7M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 57.5¢ | 60.0¢ | 55.0¢ | $1.038M | 1.802M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5263 | 57.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0¢ | 24999 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CPV (ASX) Chart |