IceyI've just double checked going back through the ASX releases...

Icey

I've just double checked going back through the ASX releases and there are a couple of adjustments, but they don't have any bearing on my claim that Cook has made a baseless comment.

I've corrected Dec 08 (I had $1.46m but there was a revised royalty announced up to 1.9m which I had missed) and I corrected the last March 2010 figure - I had typed $9.1m but it should have been $9.7m.

Apart from these minor corrections, the rest of the data correlates to the ASX releases - a bit of a pain for me going back over ASX releases, but Peter Cook should have had the figures at his fingertips. If my data is incorrect, it is because Biota have published wrong data in their ASX releases...

GSKQ3 GSKQ4 GSKQ1 GSKQ2
Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07
$5.4m $7.3m $16.0m $11.0m

Sep-07 Dec-07 Mar-08 Jun-08
$4.5m $12m $4.4m $0.4m

Sep-08 Dec-08 Mar-09 Jun-09
$1.9m $1.9m $32.3m $8.9m

Sep-09 Dec-09 Mar-10 Jun-10
$24.1m $32.6m $9.7m

June 07 Royalties - 2nd highest of the year
June 08 Royalties - lowest of the year
June 09 Royalties - 2nd highest of the year

I don't need to write Biota an email - they definitely monitor HotCopper. Let's just wait and see how and when they explain this one.