gents
the only item that has not been factored in to any of the above, is a successful outcome in the court proceedings for CKK, which could reasonably lead to a very substantial award of damages --- where those damages can not be paid in cold hard cash, then the drill comes back into the equation as an asset that can be provided in lieu of cash --- as for the case itself, as a lawyer (forgive me), the facts aren't long and tortuous, and finding who in fact is in breach should be pretty straight forward -- on a damages front, were CKK successful, the award for damages would include lost profits over a the life time of reasonable commercial exploitation of the technology/drill, minus royalty/licence payments - such a head of damages relies upon expert evidene of what the drill could reasonably earn p.a. x (times) a reasonable number of years the licence agreement would have likely remained in place, but for the licensor wrongly repudiating the agreement (if that's what the court finally determines) --- anyhoos, point is, a successful outcome would result in substantial cash and/or the drill being returned, which would only have the effect of lighting a very short fuse under the SP sending it up up and away from its current doldrums...
... or am I mistaken about something?
btw, I hold only in so far that I recommended CKK to the ex who poured a few bucks into taking up a small position - so I'm keeping an eye on where this all ends up for her
good luck
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CKK
- coretrack - a remarkable story
coretrack - a remarkable story, page-19
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 23 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CKK (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online