correction getting much closer now., page-118

JWM

OK, and I look at dates as not a thing to play into, more as a time to watch for a turn.

I have been saying that June 28 has the potential to be a low but also that July 1 has the potential to be a high.

This leaves me in a bit of a quandry as both seem unlikely but not impossible.

This is based on Armstrong's cycle length of 392 cal days that produced the exact date of the 2003 low from the 2002 high, 1 day off a high in 2004, the exact day of the 2005 low.

I don't pretend that I can predict every top or bottom.