Much of the junk left on the sea bed, and presumably the structures still in use, appear to provide habitat for marine life which didn't previously exist there. Hydrocarbons can be purged prior to decommissioning of pipelines and structures can be cut down to a level where there is no risk to shipping (I think 55m below surface was mentioned). Is there a case for concern that complete removal may have a worse environmental outcome than leaving some of it behind?
The scars left by mankind's activities on land are seldom removed and the environmental consequences never reversed. IMHO this is a strong argument for putting wind farms offshore.
- Forums
- Economics
- Cost Down, Size up or is it? Wind power size increase
Much of the junk left on the sea bed, and presumably the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online