Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Cost of action versus inaction, page-2

First 2 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
AmbrosePethick

20,062 Posts.

26/02/20

11:11

Post #: 43158454
Share

Originally posted by bacci: ↑

I notice politicians playing a verbal trick on uneducated media listeners.

The trick is to say "the cost of action versus inaction". Shallow listeners will assume that action or inaction are opposite alternatives of the same thing, they are not. Australia will pay both.

The cost of "action" is the cost to Australia of action by Australia. The cost of "inaction" referred to is the cost to Australia of inaction by the world. Hence by paying for "action" Australia will not avoid the cost of "inaction". We will pay both because (if you believe in global warming) China and India have no intent of changing course.

bacci

Expand

It was mentioned on tv last night that modelling in NZ has shown that to achieve their 0% emissions goal they will take a 15% hit to their GDP and for OZ it would be higher than 15%.

I will do a search and see if I can verify the 15%
6 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

CBA

CBA down as BHP goes up – what's going on, and, will CBA stocks correct?

CCO

The Calmer Co FY25 revenue hits $8 million, up 86% on FY24

ASX Market Close: Local bourse dips red as CBA profit takers swoop

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

Thursday's HotCopper trends: Vault Q4 miss, Peak raise | July 3

GLF

Gemlife used the ASX's new IPO fast-track. Is this the start of a new cycle?

Trump chides Powell as Goldman call for calm. The RBA must be nervous

SFM

Why is Santa Fe Minerals up 370% on Thursday?

RML

Resolution looks to 'strong historical data' as Horse Heaven search begins

ASX Market Open: Oz shares dip back (very slightly) after Wed's record close | July 3

First 2 Last

SPONSORED BY