count down, page-29

Please correct me if my understanding of the voting situation below is incorrect.
As of Sept 2012 the top 20 shareholders held 46% of the total volume. Unfortunately I have been unable to access the top 20 shareholders of recent times but assuming its a similar figure there's not much of a chance that issues up for a vote will be rejected unless one of these top 20 and every other person holding stock vote against an item the chance of defeating any proposal made by the board would not be possible.
I'd imagine FMS would have a closer relationship with individuals and instos with substantial holdings.
I would like to think the point of remuneration would be rejected and really I can't believe they had the nerve to even put it forward considering the current situation however I will be surprised if it is rejected for the above mentioned reason.