Do you realise that when Gem said that they sold Commercial grade rubies that this pretty much means they also sold some of the lowest grade material they had? Commercial grade is the stuff that they can't use in Jewellery. So, no the expectations aren't over the top. As a percentage of what Gem would have sold, the quality breakdown of product available would have been heavily skewed to the commercial material and this is self-evident in the numbers because if it were fine rubies that they were selling the price would have been in the $300 - $600 range as per previous Gem auctions which were Medium to high quality.
You alluded to primary vs secondary deposits, however, I don't believe that you actually believe there is a difference in the material being mined from the different sources.
If anything people who are using $60 per ct as an expectation of results are being far too conservative.
MUS has not categorically stated that they will be selling everything "because I understand MUS will be selling basically every ruby they have found" We had a little insight through an unfortunate incident not so long ago that management has earmarked some stones to be excluded from the auction, just over 20K of them were stolen.
The real question I have for you is, just how much digging have you done?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Countdown to Auction
Do you realise that when Gem said that they sold Commercial...
Featured News
Add G79 (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
BTH
BIGTINCAN HOLDINGS LIMITED
David Keane, Co-Founder & CEO
David Keane
Co-Founder & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online