i can tell you without hesitation that modelling will give you...

i can tell you without hesitation that modelling will give you whatever results you want - just need to modify the assupmtions to suit your purpose.
Economists are great at it - lets modify this that and the other and voila it matches what i want as a conclusion!!


would be really useful to have explained how they came to that conclusion and what assumptions were used in any modelling that may have taken place.

lets see what happens - IMO (but DYOR):

1) will not become cashflow positive;
2) another CR will occur with some ANN predicting some expectation BUT we only need the CR funds to get us by till then;
3) shipload of funds into R&D and as a consequence bonuses based on non-transparent (to SH's) KPI's;
4) will be interested to see at what point they may release an uipdated ANN regarding timing of cashflow positiveness - at what point will they decide to let market know that their prediction will not be met?. Alternatively will they release an ANN confirming that they still expect that cashflow positivity will occur when expected (now that would provide a positive to SP IMO).

all IMO - and yes comments due to lack of my personal investor confidence in the way the ship is being and has been steered in recent years. however am happy to be corrected if i have overlooked somethng.