court case W AUST, page-19

You honestly believe (the word "think" is inappropriate) that an impoverish African nation, whose debt to the IMF is already classified as "in distress", is going to have a lazy $1.5B available for Sundance?


Source:
https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2022/07/18/Republic-of-Congo-First-Review-under-the-Three-year-Extended-Credit-Facility-Arrangement-520923


And besides, if this claim is proven to be true in the ICC, then the Nababa mining license was obtained dishonestly to begin with.





That in itself could make any claims against the Rep of Congo null and void?

Pass the popcorn?