Hi Neil,
I have re-read your posts, and i make the following conclusions.
Your initial post starts with what appears to be a rhetorical question. "I am just curious as to why everyone is trying to make a possible link to mining when that would involve another major Transformation of activities, wouldn't it?"
After which you attempt to impugn the credibility of the poster, by adding the following remarks "
completely new member" "
who is a non-holder" "
seems to know about the activities of the business".
None of this is relevant to your question, nor your assertions that "it is now all anybody can talk about".
The only reason to include those remarks, as you would know from your marketing history, are to present the narrative that the poster, and thus the information posted, is not credible. I addressed this in my post
65356277I did not respond to your reference of the 1990's. We have been discussing the very recent formation of a mining company, Mars Limited.
In your reply to my post, you added a clarifier to one of your assertions. Unfortunately, this doesn't change the irrelevance of your statement, all of the information posted has been factual, and unable to be refuted by yourself. Casting aspersions to it being nothing but conspiracy theories, does little more than show the lack of rebuttal available.
"Just more
(possible) ghosts, rabbit holes and conspiracies, isn't it? Added a clarifier, to be fair to your reply."
Now in post
65358043 you state you didn't say you have known about it for years. Ok Neil, i will accept that is true. So then can you please explain the meaning of this statement?
I would suggest, since NO ONE knew until
@FrankAZ was kind enough to share that information here, after it was revealed in the Medcan legal dispute, that the CEO spends 6months of the year in a different country. The company was created in October 2021, so barely a year since. This isn't "years" in the plural sense. And it had NEVER been mentioned on this forum in that time. The American company was incorporated 11 months ago, 21st of January 2022, less than a year.
Grammatical structure notwithstanding, it doesnt change the tone and content of your remark.
The only logical reason for it, is to cast the recent posts in a negative light, by suggesting all this information is known to shareholders, and thus posters should cease talking about it and only stick to the Neil approved narrative. Is this correct? If not,, please cease bickering about the information in others posts, either refute it with your own information, or post your own narrative in the relevant thread.
"
The mining information about Mars Mining Ltd has been on there for years and has been readily available."
And
Finally, again bringing out the Victim card.
You claim you don't waste words because people who don't like you (or the stock, or are simply contrarians) prevents you from contributing information here.
I see your volume of posts, and do not believe this to be true. Nothing has stopped you posting here, as frequently as your heart desires.
I have liked and referenced many of your posts in the past, that called out misinformation with actual facts (e.g the house/office rental drama, or the supposed double dipping of director payments)
However lately your posts seem to berate others for providing information, or contain nothing of value but are designed to hide any narrative you dislike. I simply wish the content of your posts would have more factual contribution, and less cheerleading, for a company you profess to have lost a lot of money in, lets see some results for shareholders and not just blind faith!
Food for thought for every shareholder (and even non-holders, i don't discriminate!),
Cheers and best wishes to all.
