Court Update November 28th 2022 Medcan v CGB, page-8

I don't count it as being a silly question when I discover from an accidental source that the MD dedicates half his time in another country where there is no apparent interest to the company he's supposed to be representing on behalf of the shareholders who extend their financial support to enable the company to survive.

Notwithstanding the fact he's reaping a fulltime salary from the coffers of the company he's alleged to be running whilst it's in the throws of failure.
Again

Again, what's silly about that question?

Captain of the ship isn't even in the wheelhouse to guide it to safety in turbulent waters.
What's difficult to understand about that behaviour?