Sacked for not following "a lawful and reasonable direction".
Totally arbitrary based on faulty testing of an experimental product which was supposed to be censored from the public for 75 years.
No proper informed consent could have existeed at that time and now we know that 100% with the data available and if anything this teacher made an absolutely reasonable decision based on the facts available to refuse the jab at that time.
Judges are appearing to be directed by someone or something to continue support these unlawful mandates worldwide.
Maybe just maybe these judges have a lot to lose.
Can you imagine the power behind all this.
Any victories for the little guy are based on minor fringe areas but the big overreach continues.
Sacked for not following "a lawful and reasonable...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 932 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)