Have a look at the reported dates (April 20 to May 27) that these 'reporters' have decide to pick. April 20 in Delhi was clearly the peak in cases and restrictions had already been in place to minmise movement. On the other hand Tamil Nadu was only beginning there upswing in cases and didnt reach peak until May 25. With a very sharp decline afterwards. Both areas had the same increase and decrease but just at different times. The same is true for all other states mentioned.
Once again, misleading information with authors just picking and choosing dates to suit the narrative.
Can you explain why Tamil Nadu had such a sharp decline in cases straight after the authors identified dates? Clearly wasnt due to IVM because why would they be suing? FYI, Delhi also has 2.5x the case rate per 100,000 and 3x the death rate per 100,000. The authors didnt seem to report that.
