Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Thanks restska. I look forward to the next report when more...

First 27917 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Ciao!

7,064 Posts.

44

31/01/22

18:05

Post #: 59252666
Share

Originally posted by retska: ↑

Yeah, you're right. They seem to make it deliberately difficult to get the real numbers out, but what it comes down to is the 4 deaths among the double vaccinated (+21 days) 10-14 y.o. is very concerning when its from a sample size of about 140 children (1678 person-years in the dataset; div by 12 = 140).
I am qualified in data and statistical analysis, so while not comfortable with the graph I initially posted, my qualified opinion would be that there is serious cause for concern and each of those 4 deaths would need to be investigated further. I would certainly hope the authorities did so in England before rolling out further jabs to the kids. Stating there is a 2000 times greater risk of death based on 4 deaths is where it becomes misleading, better to say 4 died from the approx 140 children in that category.
Thats just me, being honest, unlike the politicians who commit blatant fraud every day classifying vaccinated people as unvaccinated among the numerous other devious mistruths they employ.

Expand

Thanks restska. I look forward to the next report when more meaningful quantities wold be present.
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

LU7

Lithium Universe (ASX:LU7) board visits Quebec to engage key stakeholders

LRV

Larvotto identifies new exploration target at NSW's Hillgrove, boosting shares by nearly 20%

RCE

Recce's R327 found effective against E.coli during clinical trial

SS1

Sun Silver gets that drill to thrill feeling from high grade hits at Maverick Spring

Week 26 Wrap: Cerberus of inflation barks – rents, electricity & fuel – and world watches two elders bicker

There are more pages in this discussion • 70,523 more messages in this thread...

First 27917 Last

SPONSORED BY