Notice how the max % figure is 95% That is as far as it can...

  1. 1,508 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 132
    Notice how the max % figure is 95% That is as far as it can possibly get . Another interesting detail on this list is that Australia is not on it . Also look at the jab status of Canada as a comparable guide to Australia . Why you ask ? most obvious to me are Similar population density and age , Health access ,
    Than we can add the fact that their mandates are far more draconian , widespread and prolonged , Yet their figure is at 86 % . Countries with 95 % are countries much smaller land mass and have higher population density . Portugal .also has a far higher older population . Look at china as a huge land mass and population and is (communist ) yet it is at 89 % , Singapore is the smallest state on this list and they too had harsh mandates yet they are at 91%.Italy with its' former; autocratic government over seeing the jab role out , France harsh mandates similar health system to ours smaller land mass and with greater population density to ours and look at their figures 86% and 83 % respectively .

    0%20%40%60%80%Share of people with a complete initial protocolShare of people only partly vaccinatedCuba95%Portugal95%Chile92%Singapore92%China91%Vietnam89%Brazil86%Canada86%Italy86%Japan83%France81%United Kingdom80%Thailand79%United States79%Germany78%Bangladesh77%Indonesia74%Iran74%India72%Mexico71%Turkey68%Philippines67%World67%Pakistan60%Russia57%Egypt47%Ethiopia37%Nigeria17%

    Source: Official data collated by Our World in Data

    Note: Alternative definitions of a full vaccination, e.g. having been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and having 1 dose of a 2-dose protocol, are ignored to maximize comparability between countries.

    Dec 13, 2020



    Jul 22, 2022

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.