“Science” of the Covid-19 Vaccine First, what was reported in...

  1. 5,581 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 367


    “Science” of the Covid-19 Vaccine

    First, what was reported in the mainstream news as being 95% effective against infection was in fact relative risk reduction, not absolute risk reduction from the double blind randomised controlled trial that took place during the more lethal circulating post-Wuhan ancestral strain of the virus. That specific NEJM paper which underpinned the emergency use authorisation of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine actually revealed an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 0.84%. In other words, for every 119 individuals vaccinated one person would be protected from being infected. (3) (4)

    https://www.europeanscientist.com/en/features/being-pro-covid-19-vaccines-and-pro-transparency-are-not-mutually-exclusive-ending-all-mandates-globally-and-accessing-the-raw-data-is-now-essential-to-restore-trust/
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.