Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

I want to know how anyone could have been given proper informed...

First 59122 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
PokerMoe

14,274 Posts.

408

27/10/22

08:19

Post #: 64420636
Share

Originally posted by Sabbath ↑

Yes I wouldn't mind so much being named 'anti-mRNA trial' but being named antivaccine is factually incorrect anyway because most posters have probably had their full quota of scheduled vaccines during their lifetime. If people use these loose terms they will not be listened to, or taken seriously, because their arguments are flawed from the beginning by putting everyone in the same category.

The only point where there is REAL argument/ debate is that have the trial mRMA innoculations helped society or destroyed it due to insufficient testing prior to use and the lies and misinformation passed on by 'tainted' health officials and politicians.

The vaccine argument is mute because the mRNA trial is NOT a vaccine trial, never was!

Expand

I want to know how anyone could have been given proper informed consent on this mandated drug.

Last edited by PokerMoe: 27/10/22
14 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

CCO

The Calmer Co’s Anthony Noble reflects on record breaking FY24

HLX

Helix investor makes partial takeover bid, proposing board changes

Consumer Staples Shine Amid Retail Slump – Key Stocks to Watch

Week 35 Wrap: HotCopper’s top watched; ‘iron ore winter’ has started; Oz inflation @ 3.5% MoM; Harris fracking flip

TBN

Tamboran kicks off Shenandoah South pilot project with SS-2H well spud

There are more pages in this discussion • 41,661 more messages in this thread...

First 59122 Last

SPONSORED BY