Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

i agree with you 100%Only thing I would say, in two years time...

First 59709 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
smithy9

672 Posts.

27

03/11/22

00:11

Post #: 64557424
Share

Originally posted by zipperlip: ↑

I don’t think that they new “exactly what they were doing “.

It is a possibility that it escaped before they had it dialled in properly because a good pandemic would have had bodies packed on the sidewalks of the poorer countries.

Some people intimate that the purpose of the virus was only an excuse to put the jab’s in arms and the virus was just a trogon horse?

The question is not what we’ve seen so far but what we will see in the next 5 years or 10.

Personally I hope that proves to be paranoia because many good friends won’t be 6’ under.
I’m going to be very happy if this is the case.

If the rise in overall deaths goes down next year I’ll be happy to admit that I was a panic merchant but if we see a few years of increases in overall death’s I won’t be telling my friends that “I told you so” because that won’t help.

Are there Any of the vaccine enthusiasts that would agree that if we see a few years of increase in overall death’s, there might possibly be some “questions” vis-à-vis the jabs?

Expand

i agree with you 100%

Only thing I would say, in two years time they will say its covid related and not vaccine related. $$$ will be added to covid treatment centres similar to victorias new heart hospital. there already coming out now saying covid brings on the onset of alzeheimers.

this people are well trained in the art of deception.
21 Upvote

Reply