Thank you for your reply. If it makes it easier, here are the 5 dot points:
- The original RCTs showed zero efficacy for any effect you'd want a vaccine for, even against Covid alpha, even applying the lowest bar.
- T cell response, rather than antibodies, is more protective and this was well known at the time the RCTs were designed.
- If the benefits truly outweighed the risks, Pfizer (the "gold standard" vaccine) wouldn't have needed to commit fraud re. efficacy and safety.
- Real-world data are even more unreliable because of the misclassification of jab status and the climate of vicious censorship.
- Funding comes from pharma, so corruption is inevitable; however, within the constraints, those who have integrity find ways to get their message out (FDA and perhaps the editors of the Lancet) by saying supportive things but showing the garbage.
If you have any robust evidence to refute the above, I'd be interested to hear it. I'm always keen to learn and prepared to change my opinion in light of new facts.
Thanks in advance.
- Forums
- Breaking News
- COVID AND THE VACCINE - TRUTH, LIES, AND MISCONCEPTIONS REVEALED
COVID AND THE VACCINE - TRUTH, LIES, AND MISCONCEPTIONS REVEALED, page-69254
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29,757 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some
SKS
SKS Technologies wins US$90M award to supply power to international hyperscale data centre in Melbourne