The doctor who does the blogs using only Pfizer published data...

The doctor who does the blogs using only Pfizer published data points to an average of one serious adverse reaction per 800 inoculations of the novel treatments.

He’s very careful to only use freely available information posted by the pharmaceutical companies because he doesn’t want to be seen as a conspiracy theorist.

I wonder if our logco friend can provide a reasonable explanation as to why this bloke, who quotes Pfizer’s own data is delusional?

PS Just found out this afternoon that a pro jab friend has received some serious news about her health.
She’s only just been alerted to the fact that there’s an issue and as such the details are sketchy so it may or may not be related to the jab.