Here's a good example of the straw-man BS, coming from our so-called "experts"
Article from the RACGP, Sep 10th:
This article states:
The reference provided for that claim of "limited evidence" is another article, from July 26th, also from the RACGP, written by Prof Andrew McLachlan:
That article stated:
That reference for "not enough evidence" is yet another article, also from the RACGP, also written by Prof Andrew McLachlan?! Interestingly, that article was from Aug 2020. Yes,
Aug 2020, a full YEAR earlier, when there indeed was limited evidence, but we all know that the bulk of investigation has occurred since then...
That article stated:
Have you figured it out yet????????????????
My
opinion:
Some so-called "experts" are clearly not interested in truth or science or medicine, with pitiful "justification" of claims as shown here.
Many seem to be mainly interested in dodging review of the CURRENT scientific literature and findings that enables an accurate understanding of the CURRENT status of potential treatments. They appear to be so captured by the hand that feeds them, that they can't/won't objectively look at the evidence and "report" on what it actually shows.
They should be embarrassed and ashamed of such tactics, imo.
They seem to be treating the general public like we are all too stupid to see through this nonsense "reporting".
They seem to think that simply parroting the same claim over and over somehow makes it true.
How about "interest in this medication" being due to people actually reading studies and reviewing data and evidence on the treatment outcomes and potential...?
Nah, we'll try to distract and scare you with:
...but conveniently ignore that about a handful of people DIE in this country every single DAY from accidental drug overdose.
Again, ZERO perspective, just fear tactics, distraction, coercion, censorship....
Welcome to clown world. Sad.
