You said you read some of my posts. I assumed you'd read the ones where I provided evidence that people who had a severe reaction (heart inflammation) after the first dose were refused an exemption for the second but you may not have done.
I wasn't saying you seemed OK with that. Most vaccine supporters at least look disturbed when I tell them this but they dismiss it as "just one or two cases". It wasn't. It was actually not uncommon here in Australia and in Europe. This is medical violence in the extreme.
I appreciate you said my concerns were justified because the vaccines were trialled quickly but don't you think those injuries should at least have been properly investigated before these drugs were FORCED onto the population, including pregnant women and babies as young as six months?
What about process one and process two? Is there any truth in what one of the lawyers who specialise in medical fraud says, that Pfizer had two processes and the product manufactured according to the second process is what ended up on the market, which was the one given to participants aged 12-15 where a very high rate of injuries occurred?
Pfizer instructed the FDA to ignore 100 participants for "reactogenicity".
Maddie de Garay was paralysed in a cohort of only 1131. The diagnosis was MIS-C. Parents were scared into getting Covid shots for their young children in order to reduce the risk of MIS-C. Do you have any concerns about this?
When you go to get another shot (and I wish you well), are you sure you're getting a consistent product and not one that comes from a dodgy batch? It's been reported in the MSM that some batches are bad. In Vietnam, 5 children died and 120 were hospitalised after Pfizer.
This should be seen in light of the low risk in children who contract Covid. A John Hopkins study in 48000 found no deaths of a healthy child under 18 from Covid. These data are supported by studies from the UK, Germany and Sweden.
As for trusting your doctor. I've spoken to 4 GPs and 1 pediatrician here in Melbourne. None of them had read the original clinical trials. One physician said he trusted "99.9% of the top experts". When I asked him to name one, he couldn't.
My experience with my children has taught me you most certainly can't blindly trust doctors.
