Do you accept that extreme censorship is a fact? If you do, then how can you trust the authors' opinion there are "no adverse outcomes reported from mistranslation of mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in humans"?
Former president of the AMA Dr. Kerryn Phelps says in her formal statement that physicians are not allowed to even report "many" injuries they're seeing. Brianne Dressen, a participant on the AZ clinical trial, was herself severely injured. She says doctors from the NIH did take her injury seriously and tried to help her and others. They "approached journal after journal" but couldn't get their work published. You can listen to top UK cardiologist Dr. Malhotra (whose world tour was endorsed by Phelps) say himself colleagues came to him with the same findings as the Grundy study (elevated biomarkers indicating potential for heart damage after mRNA vaccination) but chose not to publish for fear of losing funding (and therefore their jobs).
How likely are scientists to even conduct the studies that might prove such a disturbing off-target effect, especially considering they might not be able to get their work published?
What the authors say is highly disturbing IMO. It's all one massive experiment.
