I have a few questions for you if you'd be kind enough to spare the time...
When you say "the jab", which one are you referring to?
I've only researched the mRNA ones. The original clinical trials against alpha showed zero benefit in mortality or morbidity. Reduced risk of hospitalisation wasn't the PE. Moderna boss himself said it was too uncommon an event.
Can you explain to me scientifically by what mechanism these jabs could have saved lives and reduced the risk of a severe outcome from Covid in the real world when they didn't on the original clinical trials?
You can find, however, meta-analyses of studies that Cochrane Review claims show reduced risk of hospitalisation. They're selective about the studies they choose to include and those studies themselves have had severe AEs laundered away.
One of studies included is the original Pfizer one in ages 12-15 on which a child named Maddie de Garay was paralysed in a cohort of only 1131. The diagnosis is likely MIS-C. Maddie's mother Stephanie says she knows there were other cases. She says she knows a number of parents took their children out of the trial after the first dose and she felt that wasn't reflected in the report published in the NEJM.
Pfizer instructed the FDA to remove 100 cases from that trial for "reactogenicity":
Could there have been other cases of MIS-C or myocarditis censored from the trial in this way because they occurred after one dose, which is what happened to Brianne Dressen who was a participant on the AZ trial? Have you personally seen and reviewed the raw data from the original trials?
As for the statistics you quote, where do they come from? How reliable can they be if there's been a climate of extreme censorship?
Medical professionals such as Dr. Kerryn Phelps says in her formal statement that her colleagues are seeing "a lot" of injuries from Covid shots but have been discouraged from speaking out publicly. Senior editor of the BMJ Peter Doshi says in the FDA ADCOM doctors risk losing their medical licence. Dr. Jessica Rose had her paper on myocarditis "force-retracted" without criticism of the work. Even top UK oncologist Angus Dalgelish says what ended up published wasn't what he wanted to say.
Real-world evidence doesn't support what you say. Feel free to contact Monte Vista school in California US. Among 800 students, they've had 4 cases of myocarditis. Before the mandates here, two journalists (Georgia Clark and Denham Hitchcock) got heart damage after Pfizer. Neither of the cases was mild and there's no information as to whether there's permanent scarring.
