Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Or the more likely reason is he never did any more jabs after...

First 96258 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
spiderman14

6,009 Posts.

301

27/05/24

18:24

Post #: 74031405
Share

Originally posted by Sabbath: ↑

No, I won't - I'm just curious what goes through a persons mind when they assess the risk reward ratio of catching an influenza variation and an injection that FDA, CDC, Pfizer, NIH, NHS, The Lancet, BMJ The NEJoM, TGA have all conclusively stated that there is a risk involved and that it does not do what it was intended to do? And this was back in 2021.

So how did you weigh up the potential risk and what criteria did you use to establish that the injections were 'safe and effective' when all the government bodies and agencies have stated it is not.

My question is in search as to why all those agencies and their disclosures made me take an totally opposite path by not participating in the biggest medical trial in history.

Curious, what makes you think the way you do? Have I missed something in my analysis of the potential risks?

Expand

Or the more likely reason is he never did any more jabs after the first 2 or 3, he's just a sad case that comes here with one or 2 other equally screwed up mates from the day traders forum or their Marxist gatherings to stir us up, cause that's what gaping aholes do.
4 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

With financials holding the fort, materials must step up with some heavy lifting to stimulate stocks

End of FY is a time to juggle wins, losses and capital gains taxes

Eurozone-based companies find new ways to secure a regional lithium supply

Time for retail therapy buying in the shopping Scentre for hot stocks

SS1

Sun Silver submits US$60M Silver Paste Funding Application to US DoE

There are more pages in this discussion • 2,032 more messages in this thread...

First 96258 Last