I referred to his comments on comorbidities and other confounding factors and nothing esle.
Your habit of injecting much more than what is actually said makes you a part of the problem.
Ram has been putting up some good articles, but people need to comprehend what they are reading properly. Some of the articles you guys have claimed as definitive proof are in fact not actually so. The writers correctly used the term 'suggests' highlighting that and also OR contributing to in part in the virus harm paper. In each case they leave open the fact something else may be responsible in whole or part.
Nothing wrong with the articles per se - just the comprehension of the articles. Read what is there and not what you want to see.
