So the Australian CDC...wait, you guys did know we now have a...

So the Australian CDC...wait, you guys did know we now have a CDC didn't you? Anyway, a quick flip through the PDF alerts me that they will probably use this new taxpayer-funded government monster as the means to implement diktats from the WHO. One world government again, how much more evidence do we need at this point? Here's some choice lines.


https://www.cdc.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-12/role-and-functions-of-an-australian-centre-for-disease-control.pdf

"The CDC should be a trusted, national source of information and advice,
underpinned by effective governance, and certainty of funding. The
governance arrangements for the CDC must ensure confidence and trust from the
Australian people and the international public health community (led by the World Health
Organization)."

"As one of the most substantially funded public health agencies, the US CDC offers
snapshots into numerous other possible roles and scopes. In particular, the US CDC’s role in
global health programs and partnerships with the World Health Organization may serve as a
guide for how the Australian CDC can work." (Note the implied connection to the U.S. CDC which hints at this being one global department)

"A CDC could strengthen Australia’s approach to health emergency management by building
on the current coordination role of the NIC to support a PHEOC implementing a
comprehensive program of preparedness, planning and capacity building aligned with the
World Health Organization’s Framework for PHEOCs (public health emergency operations centre)."

"The health and wellbeing of Australians is affected by considerably more factors than exist
within the direct remit of the health portfolio. Wider determinants of health, defined by the
World Health Organization as the “non-medical factors that influence health outcomes”, are
significant drivers behind susceptibility to disease and health-seeking behaviours and can
account for up to 55% of health outcomes. Public health policy cannot be genuinely
effective without regard to the wider determinants of health.
Examples of wider determinants of health include:
• generational trauma
• employment and income
• unemployment and job security
• working conditions
• access to social security and services
• food security
• education and development
• access to stable housing and shelter
• the environment
• family relationships, including exposure to domestic abuse and violence, and
• access to health services"

"The International Health Regulations (IHR) establish the need for
signatory nations to establish a National Focal Point that will act as a
liaison point with the World Health Organization (WHO) and public
health bodies within each nation. National Focal Points are critical to
the implementation of the IHR as they conduct the communications
aspects of the IHR, both within countries and internationally.
Under the IHR, each State Party is required to designate or establish
an NFP, a national office or centre (not individual person) that is
accessible at all times for IHR-related communications with the WHO
and relevant sectors within the country. As the designated point of
contact between the WHO and State Parties, it is essential that NFPs
are provided with the necessary authority, capacity, training and
resources to effectively carry out their functions required of them by
the IHR." (Sounds like a global police/gestapo to me?)

"A pandemic is an epidemic that affects the entire world, such as the
worldwide spread of a new disease or the COVID-19 pandemic. The
World Health Organization is responsible for declaring when a global
pandemic is occurring." (so if there's an outbreak of something in Africa the WHO will dictate that everyone in Australia has to line up for more death jabs?)

Plenty of other interesting/alarming stuff in the linked PDF.

Link to petition about it here.

https://citizengo.org/en-au/node/212863?dr=24835967::f72542a62576621f2201e9d7cc3541df