Scientific Studies on Vaccine Injuries
You want science? Here's your f*cking science.
Jessica Rose just recommended this reference list concerning vaccine injury scientific studies to me.I hope you find it useful. -This post mainly consists of scientific studies (both peer reviewed and preprints), systematic reviews, case studies (a few key ones of the thousands out there), and other medical journal articles that support the assertions in my Vaccine Injury post from November 2022. I began bookmarking these studies in late 2021, but since I’ve surely missed some, this is not a comprehensive list. (In fact I’m still adding studies from the past 6 weeks, though they should all be included by the end of July.) It is, however, significant enough to utterly debunk the “safe and effective” propaganda of the past three years. (I will continue adding to this list indefinitely, so please check back on occasion for the most recent scientific discoveries about C19 vaccine injuries.)
I’m not a scientific researcher, data analyst, or medical professional. Neither are most of my readers. However I, and presumably they/you, are fully intellectually capable of reading and understanding the discussions and conclusions in most of the studies listed below. For those of you who prefer to skim, in most cases, after each link below, I include a short (2-3 sentence) summary of the study’s conclusions.
Some of the studies below are followed by a supporting article explaining its findings in layman’s terms. All such articles are written by experts in their field, including scientific researchers, professors, data analysts, PhDs, MDs and other medical professionals. (Some accompanying articles are under a paywall, for which I apologize, however I’m happy to email my readers free versions of any linked articles upon request.)
Lastly, please take note that much of the pro-jab jargon used in these studies is required to survive peer review. Journals are beholden to (funded and captured by) the pharmaceutical industry. Researchers have stated outright that they cannot get published on this topic without the inclusion of pro-vaccine rhetoric in their studies.
Please use this post as a resource to backup your own arguments with uninformed acquaintances who continue to believe and perpetuate the false government/Pharma narrative that the C19 “vaccines” are safe. They are not, and the following evidence couldn’t be more clear about that.
General Adverse Events
Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22010283
(Peter Doshi—senior editor of the BMJ—study concluding that Covid vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated. And that the excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization. Explanatory articles here, here, and here.)Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987723000117
("If our hypothesis were to be confirmed, the implications for public health would be staggering and appalling in the context of the mass-scale COVID-19 vaccination already taking place, particularly if the nms-mRNA enters brain, bone marrow, and – if already present in the vaccinee – cancerous or pre-cancerous cells, or if the vaccine is administered to females early in their pregnancy and the nms-mRNA transfects embryonic cells.")‘Spikeopathy’: COVID-19 Spike Protein Is Pathogenic, from Both Virus and Vaccine mRNA
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/11/8/2287
("This paper reviews autoimmune, cardiovascular, neurological, potential oncological effects, and autopsy evidence for spikeopathy." Also, " Treatment modalities for ‘spikeopathy’-related pathology in many organ systems, require urgent research and provision to millions of sufferers of long-term COVID-19 vaccine injuries. We also advocate for the suspension of gene-based COVID-19 vaccines and lipid-nanoparticle carrier matrices, and other vaccines based on mRNA or viral-vector DNA technology.” Comprehensive explanatory article here.)The Novelty of mRNA Viral Vaccines and Potential Harms: A Scoping Review
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8800/6/2/17
(The COVID-19 vaccines are known to be unsafe for several reasons: 1) the Wuhan Spike protein damages cells, tissues, organs, and causes blood clotting, 2) the lipid nanoparticles may have toxicity from the PEG or polysorbate 80 or from syncytia formation, 3) the mRNA appears to be resistant to ribonucleases and is not broken down in the body. As some point the mRNA or fragments could interfere with gene function or alter other microRNAs that are managing the human genome. Explanatory article here.)COVID-19 vaccines – An Australian Review
https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/covid19-vaccinesan-australian-review.pdf
(This scathing paper has to be read to be believed but here’s the big takeaway: “mRNA vaccines are neither safe nor effective, but outright dangerous.” Summary article here.)National Academies Committee on Review of Relevant Literature Regarding Adverse Events Associated with Vaccines March 30 2023: Written material accompanying oral remarks.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369755622_National_Academies_Committee_on_Review_of_Relevant_Literature_Regarding_Adverse_Events_Associated_with_Vaccines_March_30_2023_Written_material_accompanying_oral_remarks
(“These comments contain a number of novel analyses conducted relating to Covid-19 vaccine safety.”)Is the US’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System broken?
https://www.bmj.com/content/383/bmj.p2582
(This article from Nov 2023 is remarkable in what it implies. The BMJ doesn’t come out directly and accuse the CDC of lying but it comes very close: "The BMJ has learnt that in the face of an unprecedented 1.7 million reports since the rollout of covid vaccines, VAERS’s staffing was likely not commensurate with the demands of reviewing the serious reports submitted, including reports of death. While other countries have acknowledged deaths that were “likely” or “probably” related to mRNA vaccination, the CDC—which says that it has reviewed nearly 20 ,000 preliminary reports of death using VAERS (far more than other countries)—has not acknowledged a single death linked to mRNA vaccines." Explanatory article here.)Gene-based COVID-19 vaccines: Australian perspectives in a corporate and global context
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0344033823007318
(“Neither risk nor cost can justify these products for the vast majority of people. Lack of efficacy against infection and transmission, and the equivalent benefits of natural immunity, obviate mandatory therapeutics. With the many gene-based pharmaceuticals planned, a new era of pathology lies ahead. We should pause, reflect, and reaffirm essential freedoms, welcome the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, embrace natural immunity, and lift all mandated medical therapy.” Explanatory article here.)mRNA vaccine boosters and impaired immune system response in immune compromised individuals: a narrative review
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10238-023-01264-1
(“A considerable body of evidence indicates a correlation, and some recent studies even suggest causation, highlighting the potential for mRNA COVID-19 boosters to have adverse effects on the immune system. This is particularly relevant in the case of immunocompromised individuals, where the overall cost-to-benefit ratio may lean toward the negative.” Simply put, COVID-19 genetic vaccination is an invitation for transplant organ failure. Explanatory article here.)COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270
(Groundbreaking global study on 99 million vaccinated people reveals increases in neurological, blood, and heart conditions associated with COVID-19 vaccines. Explanatory article here and video here.)Exploring COVID-19 Vaccines ‘Safety Signal’ Data on Vigiaccess.org: A World Council for Health Report
https://osf.io/preprints/osf/67njd
(Conclusions: It Cannot Be Said That Covid-19 ‘Vaccines’ Are Safe. “Whilst further investigation is needed to establish causation, based on the substantial numbers of deaths and SAEs associated with the COVID-19 vaccines on VigiAccess.org, the strategy of COVID-19 vaccination programmes worldwide should be reconsidered.” Explanatory article here.)The mRNA-LNP vaccines – the good, the bad and the ugly?
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1336906/full
(“the latest data raise serious concerns about the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines. Here, we review some of the safety and efficacy concerns identified to date. We also discuss the potential mechanism of observed adverse events related to the use of these vaccines and whether they can be mitigated” Explanatory article here.)
