We’ve seen unprecedented defunding, deplatforming, censorship, threats, cover ups and now even prison for anyone who dares question the establishment’s covid narrative. So called "misinformation" is being used as a euphemism to describe any information, no matter how factual, that isn’t conducive to the covid policy agenda which is most evident in the manufacture of consent and coercion of people worldwide to enforce the highest vaccine uptake possible. For whose benefit?
Censorship is the last tool of tyrants. Could similar tyrannical laws be implemented here in Australia?!?
Is it the role of democratic governments to 'protect us' from science and evidence that doesn’t support their political agenda?
Who gets to decide what is true or false? What evidence do they require? And what about contradictory evidence?
There are plenty of things throughout history which were first strongly denied or suppressed but then finally accepted. What happens in situations where people are raising the alarm ahead of sluggish bureaucratic authorities?
Science is the pursuit of the truth, not consensus. Consensus is a political and ideological concept, not a scientific one. Science is never settled. That's the very nature of science.
