Many “news organisations” also told us that Hillary could never Lose to “that imbecile” Donny Trump.
Just because lots of MSM services pump out the same Story, doesn’t make it true.
I suppose you still believe that Iraq has stockpiles of WMD’s and Vlad blew up the Nordstream pipeline.
Safe & Effective my Eye.
Why would those Nordic countries reduce their citizens (under 30) the opportunity to shoot up the Moderna novel treatments, citing the heart risks but allow their citizens (under 30) to take the Pfizer novel treatments when both are known to have the potential for myocarditis and/or pericarditis as a possible side effect.
Have you ever wondered why these Nordic countries consider a novel treatment to be a potential health issue to a 29 year old but safe and effective (enough) to give to a 31 year old, log?
Why have most countries stopped promoting the Astra Zeneca clot shots.
Do you have an opinion on why the “more” compliant countries have have significant spikes in their overall mortality rates over the last few years than the less compliant countries (poor nations that couldn’t afford to dupe their citizens into doing high numbers of clot shots).
Is the lack of MSM reporting on the spikes in all causes mortality rates the reason why you don’t have an opinion about these disturbing trends in mortality?
