For critical thinkers only
U.S. Public Health Agencies Aren't ‘Following the Science,’ Officials Say
‘People are getting bad advice and we can’t say anything.’
The trouble is that this sweeping recommendation was based on extremely weak, inconclusive data provided by Pfizer and Moderna.
Start with Pfizer. Using a three-dose vaccine in 992 children between the ages of six months and five years, Pfizer found no statistically significant evidence of vaccine efficacy. In the subgroup of children aged six months to two years, the trial found that the vaccine could result in a 99% lower chance of infection—but that they also could have a 370% increased chance of being infected. In other words, Pfizer reported a range of vaccine efficacy so wide that no conclusion could be inferred. No reputable medical journal would accept such sloppy and incomplete results with such a small sample size. More to the point, these results should have given pause to those who are in charge of public health.
Referring to Pfizer’s vaccine efficacy in healthy young children, one high-level CDC official—whose expertise is in the evaluation of clinical data—joked: “You can inject them with it or squirt it in their face, and you’ll get the same benefit.”
https://www.commonsense.news/p/us-public-health-agencies-arent-following?s=r&utm_medium=web
- Forums
- Breaking News
- COVID AND THE VACCINE - TRUTH, LIES, AND MISCONCEPTIONS REVEALED
COVID AND THE VACCINE - TRUTH, LIES, AND MISCONCEPTIONS REVEALED, page-51533
- There are more pages in this discussion • 44,870 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)