My thoughts. PCR gave them the high numbers of cases they needed...

First 4 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
watercooled

484 Posts.

14

04/01/22

05:28

Post #: 58619366
Share

Originally posted by What A Gas ↑

First Question: How can Scott Morrison defend his position on the provision of overpriced publicly funded PCR tests from the onset of this pandemic, and then have the front to deny public funding of much cheaper (and admittedly less accurate) RAT's Home Covid tests, when the PCR test throughput is under unimagineable pressure.

Second Question: How can the government sit back and watch the TGA approval of a health setting administered RAT's test which gives a comparably accurate result to PCR, for a fraction of the cost and a fraction of the time delay in receiving results, be be unduly delayed by the authority, when the PCR test throughput is under unimagineable pressure?

IMO, two similar questions, with the same vested as distinct from public, interest behind them.

[Can anyone with a similar outlook to me, but with a big more 'get up and go' get onto a reputable independent investigative news service in an attempt to make the above case.]

Expand

My thoughts.

PCR gave them the high numbers of cases they needed to shut us down, the same thing happened in multiple countries around the world. It wasn't about health.

An accurate test like Eugeni would only find active cases and that was never enough for them. They needed active, recovered, suspected and everything else they could find by running such a high cycle threshold. Only PCR could do this for them.

Ever wonder why Anteo had trouble finding enough active cases to run it's test programs?

Last years conspiracy theory is todays fact.

ADO Price at posting: 30.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
10 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply