Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

thanks for this ItI. I see where you're coming from. of course I...

First 74 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Scott th Ratbag

57,901 Posts.

664

31/10/24

23:59

Post #: 76409631
Share

Originally posted by It investor: ↑

pharma companies lied as they would not release trial testing and knew it wouldn’t stop transmission, but said it would initially. The testing showed side effects.

people should be compensated as the rules were bogus and based on no evidence for a virus that did little harm to the vast majority of people.

The governments and the people who gave advice without evidence caused economic and mental distress. People still haven’t recovered including businesses and mentally many have not recovered.

a royal commission should go to the advice, whether there was any evidence, who gave which advice and where it came from initially and why they made such stupid rules and mandated vaccines with such little evidence and made sure Pharma companies could not be sued. People who caused economic distress should be recommended for prosecution if there evidence doesn’t suggest the lengths they went to were justified.

Expand

thanks for this ItI. I see where you're coming from. of course I disagree but I'll leave it at that.

is compensation the core of your view? or is it perhaps the impression that you were lied to? or that the rules were unfair and unnecessary?
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

CCO

The Calmer Co FY25 revenue hits $8 million, up 86% on FY24

ASX Market Close: Local bourse dips red as CBA profit takers swoop

ASX Market Open: Yet more Wall Street highs to flow on to gaining Oz shares | July 4

Trump chides Powell as Goldman call for calm. The RBA must be nervous

First 74 Last

SPONSORED BY