Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

thanks for this ItI. I see where you're coming from. of course I...

First 74 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Scott th Ratbag

49,707 Posts.

652

31/10/24

23:59

Post #: 76409631
Share

Originally posted by It investor: ↑

pharma companies lied as they would not release trial testing and knew it wouldn’t stop transmission, but said it would initially. The testing showed side effects.

people should be compensated as the rules were bogus and based on no evidence for a virus that did little harm to the vast majority of people.

The governments and the people who gave advice without evidence caused economic and mental distress. People still haven’t recovered including businesses and mentally many have not recovered.

a royal commission should go to the advice, whether there was any evidence, who gave which advice and where it came from initially and why they made such stupid rules and mandated vaccines with such little evidence and made sure Pharma companies could not be sued. People who caused economic distress should be recommended for prosecution if there evidence doesn’t suggest the lengths they went to were justified.

Expand

thanks for this ItI. I see where you're coming from. of course I disagree but I'll leave it at that.

is compensation the core of your view? or is it perhaps the impression that you were lied to? or that the rules were unfair and unnecessary?
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

PAM

Pan Asia rebranding to 'clear confusion' after bagging $35M for Chile projects

I88

History-making uranium sample grades and an imminent drill run. Infini Resources is poised to transform in 2025

MIN

MinRes's Ellison knows he screwed up – for that reason, hunt for new Chair to be sped up

MKT

Breaking news: New opportunities for investors & companies - HotCopper opens to capital raising!

ACW

This biotech stock raised $11M in a risk-off environment. Its Alzheimer's drug could change the game

First 74 Last