Covid - the Stats that Matter..., page-125

And how are you ascertaining the NET, exactly?
50:1 - where'd that come from?

Also, if you want to defer to experts, there are many fields involved;
immunology
virology
epidemiology
vaccinology

Have you heard from 50 experts in each of these fields,
while knowing that there is only 1 that thinks differently?

And as I said before, how do you know whether the information you receive is a true representation?

That's why I started this thread; the stats are real & official - we can look at them objectively, without spin & narrative... and possibly come up with some logical realisations of our own.



We are in fact talking about a pandemic which should NOT have caught experts & leaders by surprise.
We've seen these outbreaks before, and a SARS virus pandemic has been anticipated for some time.
They should have known what to do, and been able to do it.
There are many reasons why the response was poor, that have nothing to do with assessment & course-correction.

Some of the very leaders who have been directing the Covid response... are the same who were responsible for creating the situation that led to it, covering it up, lying about it, and allowing it to become much worse than it should have.

If you look at this thread in its entirety, you should see that it's mainly about questioning narratives, and bringing some balance to the concept of automatically giving our full trust & compliance to the powers that be...
many of whom have repeatedly shown themselves to be unworthy of such.