You are all over the place. How are we supposed to have a...

You are all over the place. How are we supposed to have a reasonable discussion if you keep changing what you say &/or its context? Other than by offsetting previous losses, what other mechanism do you propose for it ending up with 14k in the bank after a 10.3m profit? I can only think of two: either the profit covered previous losses, which is a good sign that the company has done a U-turn & become profitable, or the books are wrong. Is there a third way you're proposing? I assumed the books weren't wrong, but you might disagree, which is fine. That shareholders previously lost money is always unfortunate, but if the books are right, surely the turn around bodes well for the future? Or am I missing something?