heres some of the confernece - which part does she come off arrogant or self promotional? to be she asked a very valid question about "non approved firms"
Which part specifically was factually incorrect?
Regardless of politics why arent these valid questions?
Would you prefer pollies to go on unquestioned?
https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6200763033001
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Credlin called out for being repeatedly inaccurate
Credlin called out for being repeatedly inaccurate, page-13
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 331 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)