Credlin called out for being repeatedly inaccurate, page-8

  1. 10,797 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 84
    What Andrews claims to be factually incorrect is actually the truthful evidence provided to his pathetic Hotel Quarantine Inquiry but his direct reports, ie. Mikakos and Eccles.

    Both Mikakos and Eccles have contradicted Andrews' evidence to his sham Inquiry. Mikakos has actually gone a step further and cautioned the Inquiry as to the honesty of Andrews in his evidence. That's the Victorian Health Minister right there calling him 'untruthful'.

    Further, Credlin rightly points out that Eccles has identified Andrews as the 'guilty' individual who ordered private security be used at his little hotels on Swanston St. That's why he left the Federal Cabinet meeting early and got on the phone to United Security. Andrews wants this suppressed and will not offer up evidence unless specifically asked by his shame Inquiry.

    The question now is, how did Andrews come to be directing underlings to contact United Security and why was United Security tipped off at 12.37pm whilst the Federal Cabinet meeting was still underway that they would be receiving a 'security' contract for which they needed to urgently have their staff complete an online course in hygiene?

    You see Lapdog, attempting to cover up the guilt of Andrews leads once again back to his truthfulness and that's on show for all to see (and discredit). Every attempt to cover up his guilt just raises more questions about incompetence in failing to guard a door at a small hotel on Swanston St.

    Best get ready for more bad stuff coming at Andrews. Those in the know are starting to leak.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.