Criterion column in The Australian, page-14

Interesting Dara. There is balance and false balance. I looked hard to find the writer of this article but while am happy to be corrected, it seems nobody was comfortable adding their name to this piece. While not arguing the accuracy of the facts they specifically chose for the article, those of us who have been around would realise that these numbers and ratings basically have not been changed in some cases since the UNIS launch or SA announcement.

By not changing, they can simply say they have not had time for a review rather than admit they may be wrong, especially considering so many take as advice their mutterings.

I wonder how many of us would make decisions and suggest prices they would like to buy or sell at if the last listing price was two years old? I wond how diffent or accurate they would be. At the very least, the Australian article seemed based on what is happening now and trying to simply please the reads of HC.

DYOFR

Periculum