Below is the whole translation of the article and GGG respond is...

Below is the whole translation of the article and GGG respond is proof to the posters here that keep saying uranium is not an issue for GGG when it is. Also, the respond by GGG is showing they still taking on the locals and IA government wishes.

The Naalakkersuisut has received a large number of consultation responses to the bill banning preliminary investigation, exploration and exploitation of uranium.

Among the parties to the consultation are several of the exploration companies that are currently active in Greenland, such as Greenland Gold, Hudson Resources, Ironbark, Orano Mining and Halmares Resources, all of which express strong concern about the bill, which they believe creates uncertainty about Greenland's future as a mining country. .

It writes the newspaper Sermitsiaq.

Most critical, of course, is Greenland Minerals, which in its consultation response writes that the set limit value of 100 ppm (100 grams of uranium per 1 tonne of ore) is both impractical, randomly chosen and an ambiguous guideline for exploration and extraction of raw materials in Greenland, and that this will have major negative consequences for many of the companies operating in the country.

'The proposed limit value of 100 ppm uranium is not justified by objective known environmental and social impacts. It also does not take into account many deposits of various minerals, which also contain uranium and thorium, but which will never be extracted for their uranium content. Unpredictable and sudden changes in a country's legislation create unrest and discourage future foreign investment in Greenland not only in the mining industry, but also other areas that over time will limit economic development and growth in Greenland, "writes Greenland Minerals in their consultation response.