Appears Atrum (ATU) was suspended because it's proposed mine could no longer go ahead due to changes in law imposed by the government of Alberta.
ATU has raised capital and is apparently carrying out litigation to try to recover loses shareholders were dealt due to the changes in law.
Directors hold
a large amount of ATU, 50% or so, and they've clearly lost the most.
So the suspension of ATU I'd not inthe interest of those parties, just as the suspension of RFT is not in the best interest of RFT shareholders including the BOD...
So, I ask again, what are the takeaways from this link you have unveiled?
a large amount of ATU, 50% or so, and they've clearly lost the most.
