TSF, the amount of research I put into stocks isnt necessarily proportional to how much I have invested in them (I stay silent on many stocks that I trade/invest in), its generally proportional to how interesting they are (to me) and how interesting the debate about them happens to be. You point out an interesting observation, which I think simply reflects that companies when they are struggling are more interesting and provide (to me) more to learn than stocks performing well, and for that reason I think they are also generally more hotly debated on HC (and forums like it).
As to FA, well I think I'm better at TA, but FA is more interesting.
Cheers, Sharks.
PS: it also helps that I have a thick skin and a good sense of humour :-)
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- FDM
- crucial fact
crucial fact, page-22
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 74 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)