no. You’ve complete missed the point, and I’m not surprised as you’re often wildly wrong.
Nuclear sites would require legislation, council/state or environmental land approvals. None of which has anything to do with the construction of an asset being delayed and blowing cost
You failed in attempting to draw a long bow and done nothing but embarrass yourself
- Forums
- Political Debate
- CSIRO at last telling the Truth
no. You’ve complete missed the point, and I’m not surprised as...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)