something you no doubt deliberately missed in the report...lol...
"A combination of solar and wind power remained the cheapest source of electricity, the GenCost report said, even allowing for the extra costs of integrating them into the grid.
Those costs included building extra transmission lines and adding storage, such as batteries and pumped hydro, so that power from solar and wind can be released on demand.
By 2030, the report said, electricity from a combination of solar and wind would cost between $73 and $128 a megawatt hour, depending on how much renewable energy was already in the system.
This compared with large-scale nuclear at $141 to $233/MWh and $230 to $382/MWh for small modular reactors."
and cheaper again..."Also cheaper than nuclear power, according to the report, was gas-fired electricity with carbon capture and storage and solar thermal electricity – a technology where mirrors concentrate the sun’s energy to create intense heat that can be stored."
...enjoy your touch up fix but as you rely on the CSIRO to "prove" your pointand are telling the truth, presumably the same source can be used for the cost of producing electricity..
..nothing you post can be taken seriously....keep smashing those bangas....
