Everybody has a different strategy when investing and, personnaly, I'm not focused on a hole by hole basis.
This third hole is a big step out in a theoretical target. It might hit something or it might not. The future of CST doesn't depend on it IMO.
My only goal with this post was to correct misconceptions that this is an uneconomical project without a massive resource increase, which plenty of people have been claiming.
So here is another extract of the scoping study specific to costs to put people's mind at ease :
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
