"... Hypothesising and not many erroneous judgements, they are fundamentally different concepts ..."
A hypothesis is a construct that that requires one to make judgments in the process of formulating it. If you do not make judgements as you build your hypothesis, that idea will simply collapse on its on, before it gets tested.
Its important. You raise matters (quite good ones at that), and what we try to do is to test the various components, separately and together. The point I made is that, there are errors of judgement in the components which you use to create your arguments.
--
" .... as i have said rapid innovation by many companies are happening now and I think that you are under appreciating the pace of this industry ...."
You argue that rapid innovation will threaten Clarity's products: No issues! But then, what does that even mean from a practical sense, since Clarity is part of the few leading innovators behind this rapid innovation? Is that to say that rapid innovation will threaten rapid innovation?
And if you see threats from rapid innovation being a major issue, how come you have not raised it at the Telix threads?
CU6 Price at posting:
$1.76 Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)