cua lo-1. prod testing, page-6

I don't read it the same way. I read it as they have something worth testing, but doesn't mean that if we get nothing out of zone 4 and 5, that 1 - 3 would be solid enough to develop as a stand alone.

So encouraging, and shows consistency, but still needs more detail yet. I'm happy to hold, as the risk reward just gets better and better