Whoa, this is quite a diatribe against the actions of Wayne...

Whoa, this is quite a diatribe against the actions of Wayne McCrae and the lawyer, David J E Taylor (Jnr). I have no idea who has written the article but I should imagine it is sanctioned by HC administrators and, as such, is disappointingly non-objective. What relevance the lawyer's name has is beyond my comprehension. It is quite common to have lawyers on the Board. And how he is or is not paid is pure conjecture. The whole slant of this article appears to raise the imaginary spectre of malpractice for which there is, at this stage, no evidence. Can I request that the calibre of reporting be lifted just a trifle? Embarrassing to say the least.

Cheers to the longtermers

Dossa