Thanks for your perspective bubsmark
that there should have been a trading halt on Feb 10 should be easy to prove hence directors insurance comes into play. While harder, prosecuting Blumont may be possible too, especially if someone ' inside' decided to help out with information that would validate what we all know
If someone digs a little deeper I am sure their will be murkier findings ......... Problem is everyone usually is disgusted and then move on quick ...... And the scoundrels live to do it all again and steal from inexperienced investors once again ...... And again
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- DML
- Cupric vs CP Due dilligence
Cupric vs CP Due dilligence, page-51
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 87 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)